Join our waitlist
Join our waitlist today and be among the first to know when registration opens for this highly sought-after course.
By signing up, you will receive the following benefits:
- Early access to course details and schedules
- Exclusive discounts and promotional offers
- Priority enrolment for limited spots
About this Training
Extended Reach Drilling (ERD) presents unique engineering and operational challenges that require specialized planning and execution. This course delivers an advanced understanding of high angle well construction, hole cleaning, well monitoring, and directional drilling techniques, ensuring safe and efficient drilling of extended reach and complex wells.
This is an operationally focused course that goes beyond the basics of ERD well planning. Participants will gain a deep understanding of risk factors, operational hazards, and best practices to ensure successful well delivery while minimizing wellbore instability, nonproductive time (NPT), and well cost escalation.
The curriculum follows the latest research and addresses the highest risk areas associated with high angle and complex well drilling operations. The course also critically evaluates how proposed tools and techniques may impact project risk, ensuring informed decision making for complex wells.
Participants will gain practical knowledge that can be directly applied to ongoing drilling operations or future well planning. This training has been proven to deliver dramatic improvements in drilling performance, reduce costs, and increase operational efficiency.
All topics are placed in their operational context, ensuring that each subject is interrelated with the overall ERD drilling process.
1. What is extended reach drilling (ERD) and how is it defined?
Extended reach drilling (ERD) is a directional drilling technique in which the horizontal displacement (or “step-out”) of the well significantly exceeds the true vertical depth (TVD). Some industry definitions regard a horizontal reach at least twice the TVD (H:V ≥ 2) as ERD.
2. What are the main technical challenges in ERD operations?
Key challenges include managing torque and drag on the drillstring, ensuring adequate hole cleaning in long horizontal sections, maintaining wellbore stability, controlling equivalent circulating density (ECD), mitigating stuck pipe, handling lost circulation, and selecting optimal drilling fluid and BHA designs.
3. What advantages does ERD offer compared to conventional vertical or moderate directional wells?
ERD allows one surface location to access a broader reservoir footprint, reducing the number of wells or surface pads required. It can extend reservoir contact, lower environmental footprint, reduce infrastructure costs, and allow remote targeting (e.g. drilling offshore from land).
4. In which scenarios or applications is ERD most beneficial?
ERD is useful when surface constraints exist (e.g. urban areas, sensitive terrain, offshore resources from land), in mature fields requiring extended drainage, tying back distant reservoirs, or when reducing surface footprint is crucial. It’s applicable both onshore and offshore.
5. How does ERD differ from standard horizontal or directional drilling?
While horizontal drilling focuses on extending lateral section within or near the reservoir, ERD pushes the limits of well length and deviation beyond typical ratios (e.g. step-out greatly exceeding TVD). ERD imposes greater mechanical, hydraulic, and design constraints than standard directional wells.
6. What recent technology trends are enhancing ERD performance?
Advances include rotary steerable systems (RSS) for better trajectory control, real-time MWD/LWD telemetry, digital twin and simulation models, automated drilling optimization, torque/drag reduction devices, new drilling fluid systems, and use of ML/AI to predict hydraulics and hole cleaning.
7. What are the limitations or trade-offs of ERD?
As well length increases, costs rise sharply, mechanical loads grow, pressure windows narrow, and risk of failure increases. There is a ceiling to step-out beyond which further extension is not viable due to friction, drag, and ECD constraints.
8. How is well planning and trajectory optimization approached in ERD?
Engineers optimize the well path (using curve, tangent, catenary shapes) to minimize friction forces, side loads, and torque. They integrate geomechanics, hydraulics, torque/drag modelling, hole cleaning simulation, and pressure window analysis to arrive at a feasible trajectory.
9. What does the future outlook for ERD look like in the oil & gas industry?
Future ERD will see deeper and longer wells, tighter integration with digitalization and automation, real-time adaptive control, advanced materials and tool design, and more robust predictive models. The field may also intersect with geothermal and carbon storage applications.
Extended reach drilling (ERD) is a directional drilling technique in which the horizontal displacement (or “step-out”) of the well significantly exceeds the true vertical depth (TVD). Some industry definitions regard a horizontal reach at least twice the TVD (H:V ≥ 2) as ERD.
2. What are the main technical challenges in ERD operations?
Key challenges include managing torque and drag on the drillstring, ensuring adequate hole cleaning in long horizontal sections, maintaining wellbore stability, controlling equivalent circulating density (ECD), mitigating stuck pipe, handling lost circulation, and selecting optimal drilling fluid and BHA designs.
3. What advantages does ERD offer compared to conventional vertical or moderate directional wells?
ERD allows one surface location to access a broader reservoir footprint, reducing the number of wells or surface pads required. It can extend reservoir contact, lower environmental footprint, reduce infrastructure costs, and allow remote targeting (e.g. drilling offshore from land).
4. In which scenarios or applications is ERD most beneficial?
ERD is useful when surface constraints exist (e.g. urban areas, sensitive terrain, offshore resources from land), in mature fields requiring extended drainage, tying back distant reservoirs, or when reducing surface footprint is crucial. It’s applicable both onshore and offshore.
5. How does ERD differ from standard horizontal or directional drilling?
While horizontal drilling focuses on extending lateral section within or near the reservoir, ERD pushes the limits of well length and deviation beyond typical ratios (e.g. step-out greatly exceeding TVD). ERD imposes greater mechanical, hydraulic, and design constraints than standard directional wells.
6. What recent technology trends are enhancing ERD performance?
Advances include rotary steerable systems (RSS) for better trajectory control, real-time MWD/LWD telemetry, digital twin and simulation models, automated drilling optimization, torque/drag reduction devices, new drilling fluid systems, and use of ML/AI to predict hydraulics and hole cleaning.
7. What are the limitations or trade-offs of ERD?
As well length increases, costs rise sharply, mechanical loads grow, pressure windows narrow, and risk of failure increases. There is a ceiling to step-out beyond which further extension is not viable due to friction, drag, and ECD constraints.
8. How is well planning and trajectory optimization approached in ERD?
Engineers optimize the well path (using curve, tangent, catenary shapes) to minimize friction forces, side loads, and torque. They integrate geomechanics, hydraulics, torque/drag modelling, hole cleaning simulation, and pressure window analysis to arrive at a feasible trajectory.
9. What does the future outlook for ERD look like in the oil & gas industry?
Future ERD will see deeper and longer wells, tighter integration with digitalization and automation, real-time adaptive control, advanced materials and tool design, and more robust predictive models. The field may also intersect with geothermal and carbon storage applications.